Impact & Reports

Evidence of artistic reach, community trust, and public value.

This page brings together our annual reporting, headline outcomes, financial context, and the stories behind the numbers for The Upstate Theatre Project Clg.

Headline impact

A snapshot of how theatre activity translated into measurable community outcomes.

We combine attendance, retention, progression, accessibility, and partner feedback data to review whether our work is reaching the people it is designed to serve.

2,840

Audience and participant engagements recorded across workshops, rehearsals, touring visits, and public performances.

68

Young people supported through structured ensemble training, mentoring, and progression opportunities.

14

Schools, venues, charities, and civic partners engaged in co-delivery, hosting, or referral pathways.

87%

Participants reporting stronger confidence, creative voice, or sense of belonging after sustained engagement.

Annual report

Board-approved reporting that connects mission, delivery, and stewardship.

Featured publication

2025 Annual Impact Report

The latest report summarises programme delivery, safeguarding oversight, participation trends, partnership activity, and year-end financial performance in a single public-facing document.

What it covers Programme reach, case studies, board governance, reserves monitoring, and risk review.
Primary audience Funders, families, school partners, local authorities, and prospective collaborators.
Reporting standard Plain-language, evidence-led, and suitable for donor and grant reporting requirements.
Browse all reporting sections
Report library

The core reporting areas stakeholders most often ask to review.

Community participants gathered in a creative workshop

Participation

Reach and inclusion

Who took part, where activity happened, which access barriers were reduced, and how referral routes performed.

A facilitated theatre workshop with community members

Outcomes

Confidence and progression

How participants moved from first contact into repeat attendance, ensemble roles, technical pathways, and peer leadership.

Audience members and artists connecting after an event

Community

Partnership value

How schools, venues, and charities describe the usefulness, reliability, and local relevance of our delivery model.

A public-facing event in a shared community setting

Governance

Transparency and controls

How decisions are approved, funds are monitored, risks are escalated, and accountability is maintained throughout the year.

Evidence framework

We look at more than attendance. We track quality, retention, safety, and progression.

Reporting draws on sign-in data, workshop records, creative reflections, partner debriefs, participant surveys, and board review cycles.

Access

We monitor bursary use, venue accessibility, transport supports, and the extent to which activity is hosted in trusted local spaces.

Participation quality

We review retention rates, session continuity, safeguarding incidents, and whether participants return for deeper levels of engagement.

Creative progression

We document shifts from workshop attendance into devising, production roles, mentoring, touring, or leadership responsibilities.

Public benefit

We assess whether programmes widen access to culture, create civic connection, and deliver value that partners can clearly describe.

Story behind the data

One participant journey showing what “impact” looks like in practice.

A rehearsal scene with performers working together under stage light

From first workshop to consistent creative leadership

A secondary-school referral brought one young participant into a short introductory workshop cycle. Early feedback pointed to low confidence, little prior arts access, and uncertainty about joining group activity.

Over two seasons, consistent attendance led to ensemble work, backstage responsibility, and eventually peer-support roles in warm-ups and rehearsal setup. The clearest outcome was not a single performance credit but sustained belonging and visible growth in responsibility.

Starting point Low confidence and limited pathways into structured cultural activity.
Intervention Artist-led workshops, bursary support, and repeated opportunities to return.
Change observed Improved attendance, stronger collaboration, and progression into visible leadership tasks.
Financial context

Mission delivery remains the priority in how resources are allocated and explained.

Annual budget

EUR 412k operating framework

82% of expenditure is directed to programme delivery, artists, facilitators, and access supports rather than administration alone.

Controls

Board and subcommittee review

Budget monitoring, delegated approvals, reserves, and restricted funding lines are reviewed through scheduled governance checkpoints.

Plain-language value

Supporters can see what funding enables

Reporting translates spend into bursaries, workshop blocks, touring visits, artist time, and practical participation supports.

In practice